As the 2023 general elections approach, the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) continues to face intense internal struggles that could derail its bid to return to power. While much of the spotlight has centered on presidential candidate Atiku Abubakar, Zamfara State Governor Dauda Lawal insists the party’s problems go far beyond any single individual.
Speaking at a recent media briefing in Zamfara, Governor Lawal offered a candid evaluation of the party’s ongoing crisis. He described the PDP as a house divided—not due to ideological differences, but because of unchecked personal egos and deep-rooted rivalries among its senior members.
“This is not just about Atiku Abubakar,” Lawal stated. “The heart of the problem lies in the inflated egos and personal interests that continue to overshadow the collective mission of the party.”
His remarks arrive at a critical moment for the PDP, once Nigeria’s dominant political force but now grappling with waning influence since its loss in the 2015 elections. Despite retaining strongholds in several states, the party has struggled to present a unified image in the lead-up to 2023. Defections by high-profile members and growing internal dissent have only deepened public perception of a party in disarray.
Atiku Abubakar’s candidacy—while notable for his national reach and long-standing role in the PDP—has not been universally embraced within party ranks. Critics have argued that his leadership no longer resonates with grassroots supporters and that his return as a flagbearer reflects the party’s resistance to fresh perspectives.
Governor Lawal’s comments have reignited debate over the PDP’s future and its ability to effectively challenge the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC). While the PDP still commands significant support across Nigeria, its internal dysfunction continues to cast doubt on its readiness to lead.
With the 2023 elections fast approaching, the PDP faces a crucial test: resolve its internal divisions or risk further erosion of its political capital. Governor Lawal’s blunt assessment may serve as a wake-up call for party stakeholders who must now choose between personal ambition and collective success.