Tensions within Nigeria’s ruling party have escalated as former Secretary to the Government of the Federation (SGF), Babachir Lawal, issued a strong rebuttal to recent allegations from the All Progressives Congress (APC). The party accused Lawal of harboring resentment toward President Bola Ahmed Tinubu over his unsuccessful attempt to secure the vice presidential ticket ahead of the 2023 elections.
Lawal swiftly denied the claims, asserting that he never lobbied or begged anyone for the vice presidential slot. Instead, he stated that his criticisms stem from genuine disillusionment with the APC’s governance under Tinubu, particularly in the areas of economic management and national security.
According to Lawal, his public remarks reflect a sincere concern for Nigeria’s future, not personal disappointment. He accused the APC of weaponizing internal criticism in a bid to deflect attention from the party’s policy failures and growing public dissatisfaction.
Political analysts remain divided. Some suggest Lawal’s outspoken critiques may be colored by political grievances, while others see his remarks as a reflection of widespread frustration among citizens. Lawal’s consistent criticism of the APC’s economic policies has resonated with many Nigerians facing worsening inflation, rising unemployment, and deepening poverty.
His comments go beyond electoral disappointment. Lawal has repeatedly condemned what he describes as the APC’s poor handling of critical national issues—from insecurity and education to infrastructure decay. His stance aligns with growing public discontent, as many Nigerians believe the party has fallen short of its promises.
The controversy has also spotlighted internal frictions within the APC. Observers argue that the party’s swift move to discredit Lawal may reveal deeper fault lines. Others interpret it as an attempt to maintain a facade of unity amid increasing public scrutiny.
As Lawal continues to voice his concerns, his words are gaining traction with citizens seeking accountability. Whether fueled by political history or a principled stand, his criticism underscores a broader crisis of confidence in the APC’s leadership and direction.